Inauguration Day, 2009: A Day of Mourning by Justin Raimondo

When Thomas Jefferson was inaugurated, he sought to dismantle the evolving Federalist tradition of pomp and circumstance. In a ceremonial sense, royalism seemed to have been restored, or so it appeared to him. As this blogger put it, “Dressed in simple attire, Jefferson walked over to the Capitol with a phalanx of riflemen, friends, and fellow citizens from his home state of Virginia.”

In these last days of the American Empire, such austere republicanism would be considered impossibly quaint. Having long ago morphed into Jefferson’s worst nightmare, the closer we get to the end, the more glamorous our inaugurals become. The poorer we are, the more millions we’ll throw at a ceremony that is really the crowning of a monarch – and not just any old king, but an emperor bestriding the globe.
Read More…

http://www.lewrockwell.com/…

Writes Bob Higgs:

My source is Bloomberg.Requiring the Fed to disclose loan recipients might set off panic, said David Tobin, principal of New York-based loan-sale consultants and investment bank Mission Capital Advisors LLC.

“If you mark to market today, the banking system is bankrupt,” Tobin said. “So what do you do? You try to keep it going as best you can.”

I believe he said “the banking system is bankrupt.” That seems like an honest statement. And then he said “you try to keep it going.” Pretty cool, eh. Zombie banking system. Keep it going.

Some of the bailout assistance could come from tax breaks in the future. The Treasury Department changed the tax code on Sept. 30 to allow banks to expand the deductions on the losses banks they were buying, according to Robert Willens, a former Lehman Brothers tax and accounting analyst who teaches at Columbia University Business School in New York.

Wells Fargo & Co., which is buying Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia Corp., will be able to deduct $22 billion, Willens said. Adding in other banks, the code change will cost $29 billion, he said.

“The rule is now popularly known among tax lawyers as the ‘Wells Fargo Notice,’” Willens said.

The regulation was changed to make it easier for healthy banks to buy troubled ones, said Treasury Department spokesman Andrew DeSouza.

Note: the Treasury changed the law. The pretense that Congress makes the laws, with the president’s assent, has apparently been abandoned as unnecessary in a crisis. Besides, under the present emergency regime, the Treasury is the government, with assistance from the Fed and the FDIC. All the rest is mere window dressing.

There was a lot more wrong with what happened in the Great Depression. Mr. Rogers should know that and should have mentioned that. To act as if liquidity alone was the reason for the Great Depression is disingenuous.

From http://mises.org:

The events taking place in the financial market offer an illustration of the soundness of the Austrian theory of money, banking, and credit cycles, and Mises.org is your source not only for analysis of these events but also the economic theory that helps explain what is happening and what to do about it. There are many thousands of articles available, and also the full text of thousands of books as well as journal articles. It is impossible to draw attention to the full range of literature one can use to understand the crisis.

However, below we offer a brief look into the topics most discussed in these times, with extended treatments of each in the sidebar. Mises.org also offers both a blog and a community forum for reading and discussing them all.

It’s never been more important to spread a sound view of money and banking, not only as a protection against the fallacies of “stabilization” and “reflation” but also as way to see what kind of reforms are essential now.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

• Freddie Mac: A Mercantilist Enterprise, by Paul Cleveland, March 14, 2005
• Fannie Mae: Another New Deal Monstrosity, by Karen De Coster, July 2, 2007
• How Fannie and Freddie Made Me a Grumpy Economist, by Christopher Westley, July 21, 2008
• Who Made the Fannie and Freddie Threat? By Frank Shostak, March 5, 2004
• Are Fannie and Freddie Too Big to Fail? By Frank Shostak, September 17, 2008
• Fannie Mae Distorts Markets, by Robert Blumen, June 17, 2002

The Housing Bubble

• The Real Cost of a Full Bailout, by Don Rich, August 22, 2008
• The Subprime Mortgage “Crisis” Will Fix Itself, by Steve Berger, May 30, 2007
• Did the Fed Cause the Housing Bubble? By Robert Murphy, April 14, 2008
• The Mortgage Market Mess, by Christopher Westley, May 17, 2007
• Housing Bubble: Myth or Reality? By Frank Shostak, March 4, 2003

Inflationary Finance

• What’s Behind the Financial Market Crisis? by Antony Mueller, September 18, 2008
• Our Financial House of Cards, by George Reisman, March 25, 2008
• Will Central Bankers Become Central Planners? by Robert Blumen, July 31, 2008
• Inflation is a Policy that Cannot Last, by Thorsten Polleit, March 14, 2008
• The Widening Safety Net, by Christopher Mayer, March 19, 2004
• The Fed’s New Tricks Are Creating Disaster, Frank Shostak, March 18, 2008
• The Fed’s War on the Middle Class, by Mark Thornton, June 4, 2008.

Community Reinvestment Act

• The CRA Scam and its Defenders, by Thomas DiLorenzo, April 30, 2008
• Regulatory Sneak Attack, by Thomas DiLorenzo, September 16, 1999

Short Selling

• Short-Sale Restrictions Are an Exercise in Naked Power, by Robert Murphy, August 11, 2008
• The Social Function of Futures Markets, Robert Murphy, November 29, 2006
• Don’t Sell Short Selling Short, April 6, 2007

The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle

• The Idiocy of Wall Street, by Don Rich, September 24, 2008
• The Fed is Culpable, by Hans F. Sennholz, November 11, 2002
• Skyscrapers and Business Cycles, by Mark Thornton, August 23, 2008
• Economic Outlook 2008: Darkening Clouds, Dominick Armentano, January 2, 2008
• Business Cycle Primer, Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. February 8, 2001
• Economics Depressions: Their Cause and Cure, by Murray Rothbard

Who Predicted This?

• The Financial Apocalyptics are Back, Robert Blumen
• Sowing the Seeds of the Next Crisis, Thorsten Polleit, April 25, 2006
• Credit Crisis: Precursor of Great Inflation, by Thorsten Polleit, February 7, 2008
• Mr. Bailout, by Anton Mueller, September 30, 2004
• America’s Unsustainable Boom, by Stefan Karlsson, November 8, 2004
• Who Predicted the Bubble? Who Predicted the Crash? By Mark Thornton, July 14, 2003

What To Do

• Don’t Bail Them Out, by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., September 10, 2008
• How to Avoid Another Depression, by Mark Thornton, September 10, 2008
• Taking Money Back, By Murray N. Rothbard, June 14, 2008
• Beware the Alchemists, by Ludwig von Mises, February 3, 2006
• Reflation in American History, by H.A. Scott Trask, October 31, 2003
• Money and Freedom, by Joseph Salerno, February 2, 2002
• The Case for a Genuine Gold Dollar, by Murray Rothbard

Books to Distribute

• The Theory of Money and Credit, by Ludwig von Mises
• America’s Great Depression, by Murray Rothbard
• The Mystery of Banking, by Murray Rothbard
• Prices and Production, by F.A. Hayek
• Causes of the Economic Crisis, by Ludwig von Mises
• Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays, Ludwig von Mises et al.
• Understanding the Dollar Crisis, by Percy Greaves
• The Case Against the Fed, by Murray Rothbard
• Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles, by Jesus Huerta de Soto
• History of American Currency, by William Graham Sumner
• Banking and the Business Cycle, by C.A. Phillips
• Fiat Money Inflation in France, by Andrew Dickson White

http://www.nytimes.com/…

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the last big independent investment banks on Wall Street, will transform themselves into bank holding companies subject to far greater regulation, the Federal Reserve said Sunday night, a move that fundamentally reshapes an era of high finance that defined the modern Gilded Age.

The firms requested the change themselves, even as Congress and the Bush administration rushed to pass a $700 billion rescue of financial firms. It was a blunt acknowledgment that their model of finance and investing had become too risky and that they needed the cushion of bank deposits that had kept big commercial banks like Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase relatively safe amid the recent turmoil.

It also is a turning point for the high-rolling culture of Wall Street, with its seven-figure bonuses and lavish perks for even midlevel executives. It effectively returns Wall Street to the way it was structured before Congress passed a law during the Great Depression separating investment banking from commercial banking, known as the Glass-Steagall Act.

By becoming bank holding companies, the firms are agreeing to significantly tighter regulations and much closer supervision by bank examiners from several government agencies rather than only the Securities and Exchange Commission. Now, the firms will look more like commercial banks, with more disclosure, higher capital reserves and less risk-taking.

I’m fine with this outcome in that the Glass-Steagall Act has been effectively nullified as far as I can tell. However, it makes me wonder if this was all part of some plan. Yes these firms will become more regulated in some ways but in what way does it harm them vs harming smaller firms. Morgan Stanley has had its Utah based industrial bank and word is they have been looking at the benefits of becoming a bank holding company for a while now.

So now they are a net less risky. They claim revenue will be down as a result as will bonuses and perhaps pay. We shall see. How long till the government forgets what led us here and creates the environment for a bubble again? If we make it out of this one… likely not long.