From http://mises.org:

The events taking place in the financial market offer an illustration of the soundness of the Austrian theory of money, banking, and credit cycles, and Mises.org is your source not only for analysis of these events but also the economic theory that helps explain what is happening and what to do about it. There are many thousands of articles available, and also the full text of thousands of books as well as journal articles. It is impossible to draw attention to the full range of literature one can use to understand the crisis.

However, below we offer a brief look into the topics most discussed in these times, with extended treatments of each in the sidebar. Mises.org also offers both a blog and a community forum for reading and discussing them all.

It’s never been more important to spread a sound view of money and banking, not only as a protection against the fallacies of “stabilization” and “reflation” but also as way to see what kind of reforms are essential now.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

• Freddie Mac: A Mercantilist Enterprise, by Paul Cleveland, March 14, 2005
• Fannie Mae: Another New Deal Monstrosity, by Karen De Coster, July 2, 2007
• How Fannie and Freddie Made Me a Grumpy Economist, by Christopher Westley, July 21, 2008
• Who Made the Fannie and Freddie Threat? By Frank Shostak, March 5, 2004
• Are Fannie and Freddie Too Big to Fail? By Frank Shostak, September 17, 2008
• Fannie Mae Distorts Markets, by Robert Blumen, June 17, 2002

The Housing Bubble

• The Real Cost of a Full Bailout, by Don Rich, August 22, 2008
• The Subprime Mortgage “Crisis” Will Fix Itself, by Steve Berger, May 30, 2007
• Did the Fed Cause the Housing Bubble? By Robert Murphy, April 14, 2008
• The Mortgage Market Mess, by Christopher Westley, May 17, 2007
• Housing Bubble: Myth or Reality? By Frank Shostak, March 4, 2003

Inflationary Finance

• What’s Behind the Financial Market Crisis? by Antony Mueller, September 18, 2008
• Our Financial House of Cards, by George Reisman, March 25, 2008
• Will Central Bankers Become Central Planners? by Robert Blumen, July 31, 2008
• Inflation is a Policy that Cannot Last, by Thorsten Polleit, March 14, 2008
• The Widening Safety Net, by Christopher Mayer, March 19, 2004
• The Fed’s New Tricks Are Creating Disaster, Frank Shostak, March 18, 2008
• The Fed’s War on the Middle Class, by Mark Thornton, June 4, 2008.

Community Reinvestment Act

• The CRA Scam and its Defenders, by Thomas DiLorenzo, April 30, 2008
• Regulatory Sneak Attack, by Thomas DiLorenzo, September 16, 1999

Short Selling

• Short-Sale Restrictions Are an Exercise in Naked Power, by Robert Murphy, August 11, 2008
• The Social Function of Futures Markets, Robert Murphy, November 29, 2006
• Don’t Sell Short Selling Short, April 6, 2007

The Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle

• The Idiocy of Wall Street, by Don Rich, September 24, 2008
• The Fed is Culpable, by Hans F. Sennholz, November 11, 2002
• Skyscrapers and Business Cycles, by Mark Thornton, August 23, 2008
• Economic Outlook 2008: Darkening Clouds, Dominick Armentano, January 2, 2008
• Business Cycle Primer, Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. February 8, 2001
• Economics Depressions: Their Cause and Cure, by Murray Rothbard

Who Predicted This?

• The Financial Apocalyptics are Back, Robert Blumen
• Sowing the Seeds of the Next Crisis, Thorsten Polleit, April 25, 2006
• Credit Crisis: Precursor of Great Inflation, by Thorsten Polleit, February 7, 2008
• Mr. Bailout, by Anton Mueller, September 30, 2004
• America’s Unsustainable Boom, by Stefan Karlsson, November 8, 2004
• Who Predicted the Bubble? Who Predicted the Crash? By Mark Thornton, July 14, 2003

What To Do

• Don’t Bail Them Out, by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr., September 10, 2008
• How to Avoid Another Depression, by Mark Thornton, September 10, 2008
• Taking Money Back, By Murray N. Rothbard, June 14, 2008
• Beware the Alchemists, by Ludwig von Mises, February 3, 2006
• Reflation in American History, by H.A. Scott Trask, October 31, 2003
• Money and Freedom, by Joseph Salerno, February 2, 2002
• The Case for a Genuine Gold Dollar, by Murray Rothbard

Books to Distribute

• The Theory of Money and Credit, by Ludwig von Mises
• America’s Great Depression, by Murray Rothbard
• The Mystery of Banking, by Murray Rothbard
• Prices and Production, by F.A. Hayek
• Causes of the Economic Crisis, by Ludwig von Mises
• Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays, Ludwig von Mises et al.
• Understanding the Dollar Crisis, by Percy Greaves
• The Case Against the Fed, by Murray Rothbard
• Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles, by Jesus Huerta de Soto
• History of American Currency, by William Graham Sumner
• Banking and the Business Cycle, by C.A. Phillips
• Fiat Money Inflation in France, by Andrew Dickson White

http://www.nytimes.com/…

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the last big independent investment banks on Wall Street, will transform themselves into bank holding companies subject to far greater regulation, the Federal Reserve said Sunday night, a move that fundamentally reshapes an era of high finance that defined the modern Gilded Age.

The firms requested the change themselves, even as Congress and the Bush administration rushed to pass a $700 billion rescue of financial firms. It was a blunt acknowledgment that their model of finance and investing had become too risky and that they needed the cushion of bank deposits that had kept big commercial banks like Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase relatively safe amid the recent turmoil.

It also is a turning point for the high-rolling culture of Wall Street, with its seven-figure bonuses and lavish perks for even midlevel executives. It effectively returns Wall Street to the way it was structured before Congress passed a law during the Great Depression separating investment banking from commercial banking, known as the Glass-Steagall Act.

By becoming bank holding companies, the firms are agreeing to significantly tighter regulations and much closer supervision by bank examiners from several government agencies rather than only the Securities and Exchange Commission. Now, the firms will look more like commercial banks, with more disclosure, higher capital reserves and less risk-taking.

I’m fine with this outcome in that the Glass-Steagall Act has been effectively nullified as far as I can tell. However, it makes me wonder if this was all part of some plan. Yes these firms will become more regulated in some ways but in what way does it harm them vs harming smaller firms. Morgan Stanley has had its Utah based industrial bank and word is they have been looking at the benefits of becoming a bank holding company for a while now.

So now they are a net less risky. They claim revenue will be down as a result as will bonuses and perhaps pay. We shall see. How long till the government forgets what led us here and creates the environment for a bubble again? If we make it out of this one… likely not long.

• “I sincerely believe … that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.” — Thomas Jefferson to John Taylor, 1816.
• “Paper is poverty,… it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself.” — Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, 1788.
• “Scenes are now to take place as will open the eyes of credulity and of insanity itself, to the dangers of a paper medium abandoned to the discretion of avarice and of swindlers.” –Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814.
• “I now deny [the Federal Government's] power of making paper money or anything else a legal tender.” — Thomas Jefferson to John Taylor, 1798.
• “The maxim of buying nothing without the money in our pockets to pay for it would make of our country one of the happiest on earth.” –Thomas Jefferson to Alexander Donald, 1787.
• “Every discouragement should be thrown in the way of men who undertake to trade without capital.” –Thomas Jefferson to Nathaniel Tracy, 1785.
• “I am an enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but coin.” –Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814.
• “It is said that our paper is as good as silver, because we may have silver for it at the bank where it issues. This is not true. One, two, or three persons might have it; but a general application would soon exhaust their vaults, and leave a ruinous proportion of their paper in its intrinsic worthless form.” –Thomas Jefferson to John W. Eppes, 1813.
• “Everything predicted by the enemies of banks, in the beginning, is now coming to pass. We are to be ruined now by the deluge of bank paper. It is cruel that such revolutions in private fortunes should be at the mercy of avaricious adventurers, who, instead of employing their capital, if any they have, in manufactures, commerce, and other useful pursuits, make it an instrument to burden all the interchanges of property with their swindling profits, profits which are the price of no useful industry of theirs.” –Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814.
• “We are now taught to believe that legerdemain tricks upon paper can produce as solid wealth as hard labor in the earth. It is vain for common sense to urge that nothing can produce but nothing; that it is an idle dream to believe in a philosopher’s stone which is to turn everything into gold, and to redeem man from the original sentence of his Maker, ‘in the sweat of his brow shall he eat his bread.’” –Thomas Jefferson to Charles Yancey, 1816.
• “The incorporation of a bank and the powers assumed [by legislation doing so] have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States by the Constitution. They are not among the powers specially enumerated.” –Thomas Jefferson: Opinion on Bank, 1791.

H/T LewRockwell Blog

http://www.reuters.com/…

A meeting between top government officials and the heads of some of Wall Street’s biggest financial firms over the fate of Lehman Brothers broke up on Saturday but was set to resume on Sunday, a spokesman for the New York Federal Reserve Bank said.

“Senior representatives of major financial institutions reconvened on Saturday with U.S. officials at the New York Fed. Discussions are expected to continue tomorrow,” the spokesman said. Small groups were continuing to work into the night on unspecified issues that were raised at the meeting.

Efforts are under way among Lehman executives, potential buyers and government officials to craft a buyout plan for beleaguered Lehman, possibly before the weekend is over.

Lehman has become the latest victim of the global credit crunch but Treasury and the Fed have made clear they do not want to see taxpayer funds committed to any deal involving Lehman.

Among government officials at the meetings were New York Fed President Timothy Geithner, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox.

I wasn’t able to pay attention to the market the 11th and 12th as a result of attending the Service Nation Summit so I missed the Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch stock plunge. (Morgan Stanley didn’t do well, Fannie and Freddie dropped quite a bit too.) The Fed claims that they won’t step in with credit because Lehman has been doing poorly for some time and have access to the discount window. Seems last reported was that Lehman was perhaps to be broken up in three ways with “Bank of America would acquire the bulk of Lehman Brothers, including its mortgage assets. Barclays, Britain’s third-biggest bank, would take a smaller parcel including Lehman’s asset management and fixed income businesses, while Goldman would take the rest.” However other sources are claiming Barclays has backed out citing it “couldn’t get guarantees from the government or agree on a private-sector deal to mitigate what it called Lehman’s “open-ended” trading obligations.”

It’s going to be interesting to see what comes out. They really want to figure out something before Asia markets open. Tomorrow could be a really nasty day.

In other news JP Morgan is in talks to buy Washington Mutual. With all these buyups and mergers the results remind me more and more of the 1907 panic where its believed that JP Morgan spread rumors of bank insolvency in order to buy their assets up cheap after the bank run which would inevitably occur. The neo-merchentialist/corporatist system we have continues to increase the power and wealth of the bankers and power elite at the expense of all the rest and the public continues to dig their own grave by playing into the hands of the banks and politicians by requesting more regulation and nationalization which only further expands their power.

For those interested in knowing more about the history of banking in the United States, The Great Depression and why the Federal Reserve System is bad:

America’s Great Depression

• Free: http://mises.org/rothbard/agd.pdf
• Print: http://www.mises.org/store/Americas-Great-Depression-P63.aspx

History of Money & Banking in the United States

• Free: http://mises.org/books/historyofmoney.pdf
• Print: http://www.mises.org/store/History-of-Money-and-Banking-in-the-United-States–P191.aspx

The Case Against The FED

• Free: http://mises.org/books/fed.pdf
• Print: http://www.mises.org/store/Case-Against-the-Fed-The-P69.aspx

I just checked the news and it looks like Bank of America has pulled out too. The Fed is claiming it won’t provide any funds to prevent the collapse. Tomorrow is not going to be pretty. I also noticed that Mr. Greenspan is saying the obvious: “the U.S. credit squeeze has brought on a “once-in-a-century” financial crisis that is likely to claim more big firms before it eases.”

The following is a statement presented Wednesday, September 10, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. It was presented to the media by Rep. Ron Paul, former Republican presidential candidate, joined by Cynthia McKinney, Green Party presidential candidate, Chuck Baldwin, Constitution Party presidential candidate, and Ralph Nader, Independent presidential candidate. At a later press conference, Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party presidential candidate, said he also agreed with the statement (see posting below).

We Agree

Foreign Policy: The Iraq War must end as quickly as possible with removal of all our soldiers from the region. We must initiate the return of our soldiers from around the world, including Korea, Japan, Europe and the entire Middle East. We must cease the war propaganda, threats of a blockade and plans for attacks on Iran, nor should we reignite the cold war with Russia over Georgia. We must be willing to talk to all countries and offer friendship and trade and travel to all who are willing. We must take off the table the threat of a nuclear first strike against all nations.

Privacy: We must protect the privacy and civil liberties of all persons under US jurisdiction. We must repeal or radically change the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the FISA legislation. We must reject the notion and practice of torture, eliminations of habeas corpus, secret tribunals, and secret prisons. We must deny immunity for corporations that spy willingly on the people for the benefit of the government. We must reject the unitary presidency, the illegal use of signing statements and excessive use of executive orders.

The National Debt: We believe that there should be no increase in the national debt. The burden of debt placed on the next generation is unjust and already threatening our economy and the value of our dollar. We must pay our bills as we go along and not unfairly place this burden on a future generation.

The Federal Reserve: We seek a thorough investigation, evaluation and audit of the Federal Reserve System and its cozy relationships with the banking, corporate, and other financial institutions. The arbitrary power to create money and credit out of thin air behind closed doors for the benefit of commercial interests must be ended. There should be no taxpayer bailouts of corporations and no corporate subsidies. Corporations should be aggressively prosecuted for their crimes and frauds.

I’ve been wanting 3rd parties to join up on common threads for years. This is a good start. I just hope they continue to work together and keep these issues raised.

http://www.economist.com/…

A LIFELONG libertarian, Alan Greenspan does not ordinarily advocate giving the government more power. But he does so in a new epilogue to the paperback edition of his memoir, parts of which were made available to The Economist. The crisis of the past year has convinced him it is the lesser evil. Better someone else be in charge of bail-outs, he argues, than the Federal Reserve, which he led for 18 years.

Mr Greenspan says a high-level panel of American financial officials should be given broad power to seize any financial institution whose failure threatens the entire economy, bail out its creditors and close it down. “We need laws that specify and limit the conditions for bail-outs” and do so transparently with taxpayers’ money, “rather than circuitously through the central bank, as was done during the blow-up of Bear Stearns,” he writes in “The Age of Turbulence”. (Penguin is to release the paperback on September 9th.)

If that means the government has to wade in, so be it. “Our country has long since abandoned the notion that we should leave crises to be resolved solely by the marketplace,” he says. “The critical need…is to formalise…the procedures improvised in the case of Bear Stearns. This should ensure that in the future, government financial assistance to lending institutions does not impact the Federal Reserve’s balance-sheet and monetary policy.”

He says a standby panel, empowered by Congress, should determine if an institution’s failure is dangerous enough to require taxpayer support. It would then form a vehicle to take the firm into “conservatorship”, wipe out the equity, preferably impose a “haircut” on its debts before guaranteeing them, and then sell its assets. Mr Greenspan’s model is the Resolution Trust Corporation (on whose board he served), created in 1989 to take over failing thrifts, sell their assets, then close itself down. He pours cold water on a proposal by Hank Paulson, America’s treasury secretary, to give the Fed broad responsibility over market stability.

Mr Greenspan’s proposal may be politically difficult. For years Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, America’s mortgage giants, resisted the creation of a regulator that could close them down. With other large institutions—be they investment banks, hedge funds or insurance companies—there might be even more of a fuss. And the Fed is not yet ready to bow out. “Unless I hear from Congress that I should not be responding to a crisis situation, I think that it’s a long-standing role of the central bank to use its lender-of-last-resort facilities,” Ben Bernanke, Mr Greenspan’s successor at the Fed, said last month.

Just because the man used to hang out with Ayn Rand and was apparently a libertarian Objectivist doesn’t mean he continues to be one. Anyone who advocates aggression is not by definition a libertarian. But what better way to destroy a movement then by redefining the words? Eric Arthur Blair would be proud. It was done at around the turn of the 20th century with ‘liberal.’ In economics ‘inflation’ has been redefined. Now a concerted effort appears to be being made to change the meaning of ‘libertarian.’ People like Glenn Beck and Neil Bortz nationally claim to be libertarians. Advocating government manipulation of the market and money bailouts, immigration control and war with people who pose no threat is NOT libertarian.