FCC to probe exclusive handset deals, enhance diversity in the radio business

Posted on June 22nd, 2009 at 8:53am by bile
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://arstechnica.com/…

Likely Federal Communications Commission chair Julius Genachowski has promised Senator John Kerry (D-MA) that he’ll give due attention to a petition asking the FCC to investigate exclusivity arrangements between handset manufacturers and wireless carriers. The most famous of these is AT&T’s deal with Apple for the iPhone. The White House’s pick to run the Commission also pledged to take action if the agency concludes that these arrangements hurt consumers.

The long standing request for action on this issue came from the Rural Cellular Association (RCA), which charges that they shortchange rural areas. “Yes, if confirmed, I will ensure that the full record on the RCA petition is reviewed, and act accordingly to promote competition and consumer choice,” Genachowski declared in a set of formal responses to questions posed by Kerry.

Genachowski also responded to four other questions posed by Kerry, albeit with circumspect answers that probably stem from a desire not to commit to too much, too soon. To a query about addressing the “shocking lack of minority voices in media markets today,” he promised to develop (take a deep breath here) “constitutionally permissible strategies to ensure that there is a wide dissemination of licenses so that women-owned, minority-owned, and small businesses have ample opportunity to compete, innovate, and contribute their voices to the national and local media marketplace.”

The nominee did agree with Kerry that the agency should, as part of its National Broadband Plan, conduct a comprehensive inventory of all available spectrum and the ways that it is currently being used. Kerry has introduced a bill that would make a survey of spectrum use between 200MHz and 3.5GHz a requirement of the Communications Act. And, while Genachowski didn’t sign on to Kerry’s proposal to extend the Universal Service Fund’s “Lifeline” program to broadband, he called it “an idea that I am very interested in learning more about.” At present the fund only subsidizes telephone service.

Kerry’s Lifeline question acknowledged that there is “considerable disagreement” about how the White House’s $7.2 billion in broadband stimulus money should be spent, specifically whether it should allocated to broadband rollout in rural areas, or to “demand side” programs (such as Lifeline) that encourage more consumers to buy high speed Internet.

“My concern is that we are funding projects that are sustainable beyond the 2 year window of funding availability—” Kerry told Genachowski, “the worst thing we could do is pour this money into projects that 2 years from now will not be viable.”

Putting the unanswered questions aside, no one should be surprised that RCA is quite happy about Genachowski and Copps’ comments regarding exclusive handsets.

“It is RCA’s expectation that the FCC will find that there are significant consumer and competitive harms caused by such deals,” Todd Lantor, the group’s attorney told us. “It is RCA’s hope that the Commission will move promptly on this item and ultimately decide that banning exclusive handset agreements is what the public interest dictates.”

Iterfering with contract, monopolizing the radio spectrum, treating people differently due to their class, being successfully lobbyed by small companies looking to interfere with volunary actions of other companies, advocating wealth redistribution. Can they stop pussyfooting around and just roll out the socio fascist red carpet? This bloodletting of anything resembling freedom is painful.

The New Deal all over again: US government buying milk products to keep up prices

Posted on June 8th, 2009 at 11:35am by bile
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://www.libertyconspiracy.com/…

Nothing like the classic MO of gubment taking peoples’ tax money to buy something the people aren’t buying ‘enough of” in the eyes of the politicians. Since there is an abundance of milk products out there compared to the demand, the price should be going DOWN for consumers. In a free market, such low demand forces suppliers to change their production levels, decreasing the supply to better reflect the demand, and allowing the farmers’ resources in time and labor, etc., to be better applied to other endeavors. In the end, the price and supply, and the application of effort, will reach a sustainable level both for producers and consumers, leaving not only extra time and resourcs for the farmer, but extra monetary resources for the consumer to devote to other products even while getting their milk products.

Here is a quote:

“The government has bought 238 million pounds of nonfat dry milk powder to help dairy farmers. In the spirit of wanting to help dairy farmers I bought a container of powdered milk. It doesn’t say whether it is imported or domestic!”

With the government stepping in, all that happens is that the politicians act as new bidders, raising the prices of the item, and forcing consumers to have to spend more on something, leaving them with LESS left over to spend on other products! This is backwards, a cave-man mentality that does not recognize productivity as beneficial.

Read the meandering thoughts of this Daily KOS writer (obviously, the site is hard-core socialist), and see how the writer even forces HIMSELF/HERSELF to pay more for something due to the mistaken belief that buying from foreign producers is destructive to the US economy as a whole.

One more note: If one follows the writer’s so-called logic, then perhaps one should only buy local, rather than buying products from over state lines. So if your state is a bad place for growing peaches, and they cost a lot more due to that, and you could get them from Georgia for less, you should NOT do so, pay more, have less left over, and enjoy that… expanding economy you have in your state? Hmmm… That’s right, it won’t expand, because you continue to devote resources to non-productive endeavors and dont’ haev anything left over to spend on new products. You have to work HARDER to get what you want, limting your ability to expand your economy. Ohhhh, yeah, you could also just hit yourself in the foot! That would be just as good.

This story was covered by FOX News on Sunday, June 7, and the reporter said that the federal govenment was “helping” farmers. Never mentioned the feds were HURTING consumers and making them work harder for the things they need.

Here are two articles that need dissectin’. Be Seeing You!

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/6/731071/-Our-dairy-farmers-hur…

Another, before the legislation passed. What a surprise that Tom Harkin would be involved! Hark! We hear the sound of socialism!

http://iowaindependent.com/15385/cash-strapped-dairy-farmers-pin-hopes-t…

It didn’t work in the 30’s under Hoover and Roosevelt. It’s not going to work now.

NYC advertising Marxism in city subways

Posted on February 6th, 2009 at 8:41am by bile
Tags: , , , , , ,

===

IT’S TAX TIME. GO GET YOUR REFUND!

Working families earning less than $42,000 may be eligible for up to $6,500 from the
EITC alone.

Brought to you NYC.gov/OFE, Center for Economic Opportunity
===

I just love that New York City uses some of the money they forcefully extract from my paycheck to pay for advertisements to inform people who likely don’t even pay federal income tax that they will be getting upwards of $6,500 as a “refund.”

The ad had a photo of a very light skinned black family wearing clothing more expensive than anything I’ve got on today.

Theft disguised as racist wealth redistribution disguised as stimulus

Posted on January 25th, 2009 at 4:48pm by bile
Tags: , , , , ,

Stopping the boom bust market cycle by stopping the market

Posted on November 20th, 2008 at 4:25pm by bile
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

BRILLIANT! Can’t have an inflation induced business cycle if the market is too regulated to function and the people too taxed to invest.

Barack Obama advocates wealth redistribution in 2001 radio interview

Posted on October 27th, 2008 at 7:12am by bile
Tags: , , 2 Comments »

Could his beliefs have changed since 2001? Sure. Do I think they have? Not at all.





· blog of bile · LibertyActivism.info · JailedActivist.info · land of bile · ostracize.me · ArmorForActivists ·