Barney Frank, the shameless state socialist/fascist

Posted on September 29th, 2008 by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://money.cnn.com/…

“This is the first time in the history of United States that anything has been done by Congress to curtail excessive CEO compensation,” said House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass, on Sunday. “It’s not everything we’d like, but it’s a very good beginning.”

“A very good beginning.”? They regulate the hell out of the corporations which they help artificially inflate by supporting the Federal Reserve System. Effectively controlling a significant portion of their business. Now they are nationalizing components of them or creating sweetheart deals for their friends in other firms by taking over a failing company instead of letting them work through bankruptcy. Allowing the likes of Citi Group and JP Morgan Chase to purchase assets deemed nearly worthless by the FDIC. Now Frank is bragging about how they have a foot in the door to controlling salaries of CEOs. If that’s the beginning the end is little better than complete state socialism/communism or the more likely fascism.

Is he ignorant or malicious? I hope the former. Perhaps than he could be convinced to read F.A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom.

So have you noticed what’s going on with JP Morgan?

Posted on September 28th, 2008 by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Short sales are prohibited. JPM issues $10b in stock during that blackout. The stock price did not become diluted but on Friday rose 11% even with a threat of Q3 loss. Those who may want to short, can’t. They pick up WaMu assets dirt cheap due to the fed seizing things and claiming them effectively worthless and not allowing the market deal with their bankruptcy. Obviously that’s after the fact they’ve done this with other failed companies. Given that JPM is a partial owner of the Federal Reserve, their size, connections, and history of the Federal it’s unsurprising that Bernanke, Paulson and friends show favoritism toward them.

While I disagree with some of what he proposes I think generally he’s pointing out important aspects which need to be looked at in the least.

Talks continue over fate of Lehman Brothers, Fed continues to say they won’t bail them out

Posted on September 14th, 2008 by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 5 Comments »

http://www.reuters.com/…

A meeting between top government officials and the heads of some of Wall Street’s biggest financial firms over the fate of Lehman Brothers broke up on Saturday but was set to resume on Sunday, a spokesman for the New York Federal Reserve Bank said.

“Senior representatives of major financial institutions reconvened on Saturday with U.S. officials at the New York Fed. Discussions are expected to continue tomorrow,” the spokesman said. Small groups were continuing to work into the night on unspecified issues that were raised at the meeting.

Efforts are under way among Lehman executives, potential buyers and government officials to craft a buyout plan for beleaguered Lehman, possibly before the weekend is over.

Lehman has become the latest victim of the global credit crunch but Treasury and the Fed have made clear they do not want to see taxpayer funds committed to any deal involving Lehman.

Among government officials at the meetings were New York Fed President Timothy Geithner, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox.

I wasn’t able to pay attention to the market the 11th and 12th as a result of attending the Service Nation Summit so I missed the Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch stock plunge. (Morgan Stanley didn’t do well, Fannie and Freddie dropped quite a bit too.) The Fed claims that they won’t step in with credit because Lehman has been doing poorly for some time and have access to the discount window. Seems last reported was that Lehman was perhaps to be broken up in three ways with “Bank of America would acquire the bulk of Lehman Brothers, including its mortgage assets. Barclays, Britain’s third-biggest bank, would take a smaller parcel including Lehman’s asset management and fixed income businesses, while Goldman would take the rest.” However other sources are claiming Barclays has backed out citing it “couldn’t get guarantees from the government or agree on a private-sector deal to mitigate what it called Lehman’s “open-ended” trading obligations.”

It’s going to be interesting to see what comes out. They really want to figure out something before Asia markets open. Tomorrow could be a really nasty day.

In other news JP Morgan is in talks to buy Washington Mutual. With all these buyups and mergers the results remind me more and more of the 1907 panic where its believed that JP Morgan spread rumors of bank insolvency in order to buy their assets up cheap after the bank run which would inevitably occur. The neo-merchentialist/corporatist system we have continues to increase the power and wealth of the bankers and power elite at the expense of all the rest and the public continues to dig their own grave by playing into the hands of the banks and politicians by requesting more regulation and nationalization which only further expands their power.

For those interested in knowing more about the history of banking in the United States, The Great Depression and why the Federal Reserve System is bad:

America’s Great Depression

History of Money & Banking in the United States

The Case Against The FED

I just checked the news and it looks like Bank of America has pulled out too. The Fed is claiming it won’t provide any funds to prevent the collapse. Tomorrow is not going to be pretty. I also noticed that Mr. Greenspan is saying the obvious: “the U.S. credit squeeze has brought on a “once-in-a-century” financial crisis that is likely to claim more big firms before it eases.”



Liberty Activism Info

© 2008 blog of bile is powered by Wordpress