Olive oil nanny statism and corporatism
Posted on November 24th, 2008 at 12:44pm by bile Tags: China, Connecticut, corporatism, Department of Consumer Protection, fascism, federal government, food, Gus Sclafani Corp., importing, International Olive Council, Luciano Sclafani, olive oil, regulation, soy oil, Spain, virgin olive oil 2 Comments »Have you ever wondered about the price disparity among various bottles of olive oil, especially higher priced extra virgin? Connecticut officials are now offering an answer.Connecticut became the first state in the nation last week to regulate the purity of olive oil — and for good reasons.
After complaints and extensive testing that found various olive oils contained additives such as soy oil and pomace, an olive pulp derivative, the state Department of Consumer Protection has promulgated regulations to ensure purity standards by requiring that any additive must be indicated on the labeling.
Interestingly, neither the state nor the federal government previously had regulations governing the purity of olive oil.
The issue began when Luciano Sclafani, president of Gus Sclafani Corp., a Norwalk importing company, became wary of olive oil selling far below market value. He had tests conducted on the oils and found one brand that billed itself on the label as “100 percent pure extra virgin olive oil” but was actually 90 percent soy oil. He then alerted state officials.
Extra virgin olive oil often sells retail for some eight to 10 times more than soy oil.
But, as state officials point out, there’s also a health issue at play. Deceptive labeling that does not identify the addition of cheaper soy oil, for example, can be harmful to consumers with soy allergies.
Connecticut’s new standards are patterned after guidelines set by the International Olive Council in Spain. They could now become impetus toward gaining national standards for olive oil.Americans have rightfully been very vocal critics of adulterated food products coming from China, but the olive oil labeling saga demonstrates that there can be modified foodstuffs coming from many other nations, including our own.
It’s never a bad idea to question a product if one’s suspicions are aroused.
I’m a big user of olive oil. I want my oil to be pure. I don’t want an olive oil purity regulation. If you’ve even tasted different types of olive oil it’s obvious something is up. Some taste completely different from others. If it was that big a deal the olive oil customers could have requested Consumer Reports to look into the matter. I just went and bought the brand I though taste better. If it turned out to be the 10% brand I’d just start buying soy oil separately and mixing myself. How much different really is this from “PH Up” and “PH Down” sold for pools? They sell you baking soda and hydrochloric acid for something like 10 times the bulk, straight product. Granted the PH Up lists its ingredients but that doesn’t stop people from wasting money on packaging. These rules won’t either.
And I like how they claim it’s a possible health issue. Has anyone actually complained about this? Technically everything sold on the market shelf is a potential health problem. At what point do they start providing us with the food directly? Why waste resources on the middle man?
Also note that this was all started due to a olive oil importing company because his competitors were undercutting him. Regardless of how or why… but just note that customers didn’t make this an issue… the corporate competition did. Luciano Sclafani could have just taken the information he gained and advertised that his competition was being deceptive. Could have worked with other olive oil producers to fund a third party to test the purity. Instead he’s using tax payers money through proxy to push out competition.







