Bosco’s Book Bin: A Different Kind of Teacher
Posted on April 11th, 2009 at 9:21pm by bosco Tags: Bosco's Book Bin, Christianity, education, John Taylor Gatto, Liberty Forum, money, schooling
At Liberty Forum I picked up a copy of John Taylor Gatto’s A Different Kind of Teacher. It’s a relatively short collection of essays concerning various subjects. The book starts out strong with essays about the current state of the classroom from an actual teacher. As a teacher, let me tell you that, that’s refreshing. The essays are arranged such that they continue on this tare for a while. I find myself agreeing with Mr. Gatto a lot on these points. Mr. Gatto includes a letter from a student detailing how he teaches. He discusses his form of education that required students to not show up to school as often, but instead perform community service and internships. He describes why schooling costs so much by following the money. He also does an excellent job detailing the difference between schooling and education:
Let’s get it clear in our minds that schooling is not education — you can easily compensate for lacking a schooling, but there is no way to make up for the damage that occurs without an education. Without that you are smaller than you would have been.
Plenty of brilliant and famous people have lacked schooling — George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Admiral Farragut, Thomas Edison, Margaret Meade, and many more — but all of them had a fine education.
Then things begin to slow down. With the essay, “Horatio Alger’s Country: The Mysterious Origins of American Adoption” Mr. Gatto takes the reader on a long and boring journey through the history of education in America. This section seems heavy handed and under-engaging, making the reader trudge through every page turn. He loses some of the charm, uniqueness and brevity of his earlier essays. Things pick up a bit with the essay “A Different Kind of Teacher” then they turn down a weird American Christian praising and money-hating path where Mr. Gatto extols the virtues of the idea of original sin, early American Christian congregations, bashes science (possibly a favorite pasttime of his) and explains how adding money to anything cheapens the act involved and degrades the service. Perhaps some examples are in order:
The trouble with science is that its truths are only partial. Galileo had the facts right about the dead matter of the solar system, but said nothing about the cosmology of the human spirit.
“There is joy for those who seek the common good.” Joy for those who seek the common good. And I remembered my mother’s beautiful Christmas trees that took days of hard effort to create, effort in the family’s common service. I remembered her collecting of kitchen grease and metal scrap for the war effort…
… I do have an interesting bit of recent evidence in support of Simmel’s theory. In 1971 the National Book Award for nonfiction went to a title called The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy by Richard M. Titmuss, et al., a book which undertook to explore whether valuable things given freely — like services rendered voluntarily — were more or less valuable than the same services as part of a commercial system.
The commodity the author took for his test was human blood…
The book’s conclusions aren’t the slightest bit ambiguous: where blood is sold the quality is terrible, prices sky-high, shortages common; and where blood is sold there is also frequently danger to the purchaser…
At this point, I was kind of surprised. How can someone so intelligent and so successful working in a very difficult system have ideas that are so incongruous with their actions? It seems to me that Mr. Gatto has done some great analysis of what is wrong with the system and given some solutions that can be implemented at the classroom level. At the same time, his essays in the latter half of this book point to the idea that he doesn’t support a market for something as valuable as education. He firmly clings to spirituality to support his reasoning and doesn’t understand much about the ideals of science and the impact they have on the world. He rails on machines and labor saving devices with an almost Luddite tendency. I was my clothes in a bucket and I still think his reasoning is flawed. Say what you want about Zerzan, but at least he does a better job backing up his arguments. Mr. Gatto seems to be ignorant as to how scientific progress occurs and the net impact it has on society. He also has a tendency to impress the importance of a faith that dictates that humans are so weighed down with sin from the moment of birth that they are “unfit to eat the crumbs” from under the table of god. The final essays in this book reminded me of the kind of hand-waving arguments you get from people who aren’t grounded in reality.
So, to sum up. The book had a good strong start and then got boring and finished by getting weird and foolish. Mr. Gatto has good ideas to offer, but much research and critical thought needs to go into what he says before you can use the information. The good thing is I’m sure Mr. Gatto wouldn’t want it any other way. He’d probably demand that his students crtically analyze what he says rather than accept it all at face value.





