Hi Tyranny Fighters:

1. Tax Protest of April 15, 2010

a. I arrived at 11:45 at the Hackensack, NJ U. S. Post Office at 226 State Street. The weather was warm and sunny.

b. Across from me was police headquarters. The street was lined with police cars. I did not see a police officer all day. They had no interest in me.

c. Immediately a woman wanted 7 one-million dollar bills to pass out to her friends.

d. At 12 noon a man approached me for a million dollar bill and offered that he immigrated from Spain 45 years ago, when this was great country. He proceeded to explain to me everything that has gone wrong (as if I did not know already). He thanked me for distributing the bills.

e. At 12:25 a woman thanked me for standing there distributing literature.

f. At 12:35 a man thanked me.

g. At 1:07 a postal worked identified himself as a Libertarian who voted fro Ron Paul and thanked me for being there.

h. At 1:10 a man gave me a mint.

j. At 1:15, as I was about to go home, a man took a million dollar bill, asked me what it was all about. We talked for 53 minutes. He signed up as a Tyranny Fighter and said that he was going to look into the Libertarian Party web page for more information, before he makes a decision to join the Libertarian Party.

k. I did not hear one negative comment all day. This is an unusual occurrence for me.

I distributed about 100 million dollars in million dollar bills.

What a great day, even though I was alone!

2. Civil case against Homeland security et al. was assigned a case # 10 Civ. 02239 (RJH)(JLC) and sent to a Magistrate Judge for general pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement).

3. I had filed a civil suit in U. S. District Court against the New York Comptroller, District Attorney, Criminal and Supreme Court Judges and Clerks. The District Court rejected the case so I filed an appeal witht he U. S. Court of Appeals: 2nd Circuit. I presented oral argument to the Court of Appeals on April 16, 2010. Three judges heard the argument, but asked no questions, so I assume that that this was a formality, and that they already have made a decision.

4. FIJA DEMONSTRATION OF 4–19–10

I arrived at the U. S. District Courthouse for the Southern District of New York at 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan at 11:42 am on Monday, April 19, 2010. It was an overcast, cool, and windy day. I had my JURY INFO sign and FIJA pamphlets.

Immediately upon my arrival, Homeland Security Officer Barnes approached me and instructed me not to distribute literature. I said nothing. He moved away, but he and 2 other officers stood in front of me about 20 feet away. I started to pass out the FIJA pamphlet ”A Primer for Prospective Jurors” along with my 1-page insert. As soon as I gave my first pamphlet, the three officers approached me and placed me under arrest.

I fell to the ground face down. The officers rolled me onto my back and confiscated my sign and remaining pamphlets. They left a citation for violation of 41 CFR Section 102 § 74.415(c) ”Unauthorized Distribution of Pamphlets.” I was then unarrested and instructed to leave. However I remained in the spread eagle position and did not move a muscle nor utter a sound. Passersby asked the police what was wrong with me and showed concern.

This became embarrassing for the police, so I was threatened with a second arrest if I did not leave. I ignored them. At about 12:10 pm, they called an ambulance, which arrived at about 12:30 pm. I was lifted onto a stretcher and put into the ambulance. In the ambulance were 2 medics, a Homeland Security police officer (presumably Officer Barnes), and a driver.

After about 10 minutes of discussion between Barnes and the medics, Barnes left the ambulance. One medic beat my chest and throat in an effort to get me to talk. I said nothing and did not move. They started a medical exam of me which included blood pressure, pulse, electrocardiogram, and drawing blood for a sugar test. We left the courthouse at 12:55 pm and arrived at the New York Downtown Hospital before 1:15 pm.

I was placed on a gurney and moved into the hospital. One of the nurses recognized me from my previous visit on November 23, 2009. I was left alone at about 1:20 pm. I got up and walked out of the hospital at 1:25 pm without signing out.

5. In my civil complaint against the New York City police, Judge Koeltl gave a summary judgment for the police. He did not permit a trial. I filed a notice of appeal, which has reached the U. S. Circuit Court:2nd Circuit, and the paperwork has started. Also I had filed a Complaint of Misconduct against Judge Koeltl with the Circuit Court which was denied by the Chief Judge. However I have filed a Petition for Review which will go to a panel of 5 judges.

6. The federal criminal complaint against Homeland Security has been prepared and will be mailed tomorrow (April 20, 2010).

7. I now have a youtube blog at http://www.youtube.com/JulianHeicklen thanks to bile, who prepared it and will manage it. If you have anything of interest (particularly pictures or videos that you take at a demonstration or rally), contact him by email or through his website (both listed in the addresses a the top of this E-mail) to either send him the video directly or provide him with a location in which he can download it himself and re-post onto this new account.

8. Future plans

a. I will give talks and interviews anywhere in the continental U. S. There is no fee for this. I guarantee that the talk or interview is worth the price. If the date fits my travel schedule, there will be no charge for transportation or lodging. If I have to make a special trip, I will need travel and lodging expenses.

b. I will be passing out FIJA literature at the following U. S. District Courts and dates if I can get two (or more) people to join me. One must have a video camera and take a movie. The other must have a clip board and take notes of the event. I will need these two people to be witnesses at any trial that might ensue if I am arrested. These people need not fear arrest. If the Homeland Security Police arrive, they will have the opportunity to leave. If they do not leave they will receive a citation ($100 fine) and might be arrested if they do not cooperate with the police.

Fort Lauderdale, FL on April 26: 1 clipboard person has volunteered. I need a camera person. If you can take video or still pictures, please join us at 11:45 am at the Fort Lauderdale, FL U. S. District Courthouse at 299 E. Broward Boulevard.

Las Vegas, NV on June 14: 1 clipboard person already has volunteered.

Albany, NY on June 21: no volunteers yet.

Concord, NH on June 22 at 55 Pleasant Street: so far I have one volunteer.

Any of the following U. S. District courthouses on April 29: Manhattan, Brooklyn, White Plains in NY; Newark, Camden, Trenton in NJ; Philadelphia, Easton, Allentown, Reading in PA. I have no volunteers for this day. If none appear, I will return to the district courthouse in Manhattan.

I have a volunteer who is willing to join me at the Wilmington, DE district courthouse at 844 N. King St. Any others interested?

I have a volunteer who is willing to join me at the Pittsburgh, PA district courthouse. Any others interested?

9. Other

Your assignment is publicity, publicity, publicity. Try to get more people to join the tyranny fighters Email list. Also keep me informed of any demonstrations that you are involved in or planning.

Warning: You should know that The Federal Protective Service, and possibly the FBI, is intercepting my e-mails. Another violation of our civil liberties. Be prudent if you write to me.

Mike Benoit has written a book entitled “Sham and Shame of the Federal Income Tax.” You can purchase it directly from him for five dollars. His E-mail address is in the header of this E-mail.

THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IS ETERNAL VIGILANCE

THE PRICE OF JUSTICE IS ETERNAL PUBLICITY

Yours in freedom—Julian

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

In an unprecedented defeat for the Federal Reserve, an amendment to audit the multi-trillion dollar institution was approved by the House Finance Committee with an overwhelming and bipartisan 43-26 vote on Thursday afternoon despite harried last-minute lobbying from top Fed officials and the surprise opposition of Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who had previously been a supporter.

The measure, cosponsored by Reps. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), authorizes the Government Accountability Office to conduct a wide-ranging audit of the Fed’s opaque deals with foreign central banks and major U.S. financial institutions. The Fed has never had a real audit in its history and little is known of what it does with the trillions of dollars at its disposal.

“The Watt amendment will fully obliterate everything 1207″ — Paul’s measure — “is intended to do,” said Paul during Thursday’s debate.

For anyone remaining confused, the debate was further clarified by the central bank itself: Federal Reserve Vice Chair Don Cohn and General Counsel Scott Alvarez spent much of the day calling committee members, urging them to oppose the Paul-Grayson amendment in favor of Watt’s, a member of Congress who asked for confidentiality told HuffPost.

Paul’s opponents also placed a letter from former Fed chairmen Alan Greenspan and Paul Volcker on the seats of every committee member. Such a move is in violation of House rules and Grayson was able to have the letters removed.

As the day wore on and support held for the Paul-Grayson side, the Fed still could hope that both would pass. Watt’s amendment, which included additional restriction, would then trump Paul’s.

To counter that possibility, the Paul-Grayson side moved to fully replace Watt’s amendment with theirs, leaving only one amendment to vote on. The motion carried and the amendment passed in a landslide.

The GOP broadly backed the amendment, though Frank chided them for finding their love of Fed transparency only after they lost power, noting that Paul has been introducing some version of the measure since 1983.

Frank said he was opposing the Paul amendment because it could be perceived as influencing monetary policy, which can have inflationary pressure. “Perception is very important in monetary policy,” said Frank.

Great to see out of committee without Watt’s neutering. Too bad Frank either entirely ignorant of the fact that the market already knows that the monetary policy is influenced by Congress and government, too blind to see the immense harm the FED does therefore justifying such an action, or is just another shrill for the banking cartel.

I’d love to see Paul and Stewart sit down for at least 30 minutes so Paul could better answer some of Jon’s questions.