FireStats error : FireStats is not configured

Missouri police report claims Gadsden and US Civil flags are militia insignias

Posted on March 12th, 2009 at 7:26am by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , 2 Comments »

http://www.infowars.com/…

Alex Jones has received a secret report distributed by the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) entitled “The Modern Militia Movement” and dated February 20, 2009. A footer on the document indicates it is “unclassified” but “law enforcement sensitive,” in other words not for public consumption. A copy of the report was sent to Jones by an anonymous Missouri police officer.

The MIAC report specifically describes supporters of presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr as “militia” influenced terrorists and instructs the Missouri police to be on the lookout for supporters displaying bumper stickers and other paraphernalia associated with the Constitutional, Campaign for Liberty, and Libertarian parties.

scan0023scan0024

I’ve got both a Gadsden flag and civil sovereign flag on my book bag. And I’ve watched America: Freedom to Fascism.

 

States starting to declare their sovereignty

Posted on February 5th, 2009 at 12:00pm by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://www.taxtruth4u.com/…

Several states have recently appealed to the 10th and/or the 9th Amendments to assert their state rights over federal government. These amendments state:

Amendment 9 – Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment 10 – Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

  1. Washington
    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?year=2009&bill=4009
  2. New Hampshire
    http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html
  3. Arizona
    http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm
  4. Montana
    http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm
  5. Michigan
    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(sjgu5xbql1n5xf45imuuysrm))/documents/2009-2010/Journal/House/htm/2009-HJ-01-22-002.htm
  6. Missouri
    http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills091/bills/HR212.HTM
  7. Oklahoma
    http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/state-legislator-charles-key-wants-to-limit-federal-power/
  8. Hawaii
    http://www.hawaii-nation.org/

I hadn’t reported on this earlier because they hadn’t actually been passed or whatever but now with 8 states floating resolutions reaffirming the concept of states rights as defined in the 2nd US Constitution and reinforced by the 9th and 10th Amendments it seems more worthy of posting.

Most of these are too controversal and broad unfortunately to have the likelihood of passing but the fact they have been floated and are getting attention is a good signal. Hopefully the concept of secession will come up more often and in a positive light.

 

Man arrested for wearing ‘POLICE’ t-shirt at Christmas party sues officer

Posted on December 31st, 2008 at 1:47pm by laur Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 Comment »

http://www.stclairrecord.com/

The city Belleville and a Belleville police officer are being sued by a man who claims he was wrongfully arrested and charged with falsely impersonating a police officer after wearing a T-shirt with the word “POLICE” written across the front and back.

Adam C. Weinstein, of Missouri, claims he was attending a pre-Christmas party on Dec. 23, 2006, at about 11:34 p.m. at Crehan’s Bar in Belleville, according to the complaint filed Dec. 22 in St. Clair County Circuit Court.

When Weinstein initially arrived at the party, he was wearing a green sweater with the black shirt bearing the word “POLICE” underneath the sweater. After getting hot at the bar, Weinstein removed his sweater, to reveal the “POLICE” shirt, the suit states.

Shortly afterwards, Weinstein claims he was told that some police officers wanted to talk to him outside.

Once he arrived outside, Weinstein was told to show officers his police identification, the suit states.

But Weinstein was a licensed Emergency Medical Technician and a licensed security officer, not a police officer, so he had no credentials, he claims.

Belleville police officer Jeff Vernatti placed Weinstein under arrest and placed handcuffs around his wrists, but “tightened them too tightly on Plaintiff,” according to the complaint.

After Weinstein asked if it was illegal to wear a T-shirt with the word “POLICE” on it, Vernatti told him to “shut the f*** up, you’re real f***ing stupid, you are a dumb-a** with no common sense, do you know how f***ing stupid you are?” the suit states.

Vernatti then twisted Weinstein’s wrists and quickly walked him across the parking lot, Weinstein claims.

Vernatti shoved Weinstein against the police cruiser with such force that his belt buckle left an impression on his abdomen, then pushed Weinstein into the back seat of the car, according to the complaint.

When Weinstein asked Vernatti to loosen his handcuffs, Vernatti instead tightened them and added a second pair onto his wrists, the suit states.

After writing a non-traffic complaint, Vernatti let Weinstein go, first telling him how lucky he was not to be charged with a felony and to be placed in jail, Weinstein claims.

But before letting Weinstein leave, Vernatti ordered him to take off his shirt in the cold weather, according to the complaint.

All the while, other Belleville officers stood by and did nothing, the suit states.

Eventually, Belleville’s prosecuting attorney dropped the case, the suit states.

Because of Vernatti’s actions, Weinstein suffered extreme emotional distress, fright, nervousness, indignity, humiliation, insult, loss of relationship and comfort and was forced to incur medical costs, he claims.

Vernatti falsely arrested; falsely detained; illegally, violently and improperly handcuffed and wrongly charged Weinstein with impersonating officers, Weinstein claims.

He also used excessive force, publicly embarrassed, harassed, verbally abused, physically abused, cause grievous and severe injuries to Weinstein, violated Weinstein’s protected civil rights and abused or misused their powers, according to the complaint.

Vernatti’s actions toward Weinstein were “extreme and outrageous,” the suit states.

The city of Belleville failed to train its police officers in matters that do not constitute an offense, failed to train it officers in matters that do not require individuals to be detained, failed to implement policies and procedures to prevent against untrained officers from detaining and charging innocent individuals and failed to train and supervise competent police officers, the suit states.

Weinstein claims his injuries were caused by someone who had final policymaking authority and that the city had a widespread practice of deliberate indifference to the prior improper conduct of Vernatti, that the city’s indifference is exemplified by its knowledge of previous allegations made by citizens of Vernatti’s behavior, that the city failed to investigate allegations and that the city failed to discipline Vernatti.

Belleville also failed to train other officers to stop Vernatti when he violated rights, should have known that Vernatti had been accused of excessive force on at least one prior occasion and failed to prevent Vernatti’s conduct on Dec. 23, 2006, according to the complaint.

In the five-count suit, Weinstein is seeking actual damages in excess of $250,000, punitive damages in excess of $200,000, plus attorney’s fees, costs and other relief the court deems just.

Howard A. Shalowitz of St. Louis will be representing him.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number: 08-L-654.

All you people that purchased NYPD and NYFD gear after 9/11 best be turning them in. We don’t want anyone to get the wrong idea. Sports fans, you can’t be wearing your jerseys in public. You might be mistaken for a Cowboys player… or worse, an actual cowboy. Hey, music fans–watch what you wear too. Those Miami Sound Machine tees are mighty deceptive.

Next up: Plain White T-Shirt Act 2009.

 

New advancements in freedom media

Posted on September 24th, 2008 at 9:49am by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

First:

FreeMindsTV, a libertarian cable access show in New Hampshire which recently moved to doing podcasts too, has gone terrestrial. Starting September 28, 2008 the show will air each Sunday from 3-5pm EST broadcasting through GCN. Stations currently signed up to pickup the show are:

  • WCER 900-AM Canton, Ohio
  • WBCR 1470-AM Maryville, Tennessee
  • KLID 1340-AM, Poplar Bluff, Missouri
  • KGEZ 600-AM, Great Falls, Montana

Congratulations everyone who’s part of FreeMinds{TV,Radio}. Keep up the good work. One recommendation though… redo the website. It’s a mess.

Second:

As was reported the other night Gardner Goldsmith was fired from the radio station he was at and as a result planning on accelerating Liberty Conspiracy’s online presents.

His first podcast is now available here [Monetary Manipulation by Government Part 1]and you can subscribe the the podcast through http://libertyconspiracy.podomatic.com [RSS].

One last thing, if you enjoy these programs, feel guilty for not being a big enough participant in the liberty movement or just appreciate what they are doing please consider donating a few dollars a month to the cause. How can you pass up the opportunity to become an All Seeing Eye in the liberty conspiracy? Contribute to Liberty Conspiracy here and FreeMindsTV here.

 

Cops taze teenager with broken back: 19 times

Posted on July 29th, 2008 at 11:52am by bile Tags: , , , , , , 1 Comment »

Seems to me the fall caused the kid to see the future if he was talking about harming cops. That’s the first thing I’d think of after knowing they tazed someone who was in the condition he was.

 

SCOTUS not done yet: Part of McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance law struck down

Posted on June 26th, 2008 at 1:13pm by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://www.ballot-access.org/…

On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled part of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law unconstitutional. Davis v Federal Election Commission, 07-320. The vote was 5-4. Here is the opinion.

This case concerned the “Millionaire’s Amendment”, which relaxes contribution limits for any congressional candidate who has a wealthy opponent. Specifically, if any congressional candidate spends at least $350,000 of his or her own funds on the campaign, then the opponents of that candidate are released from the $2,300 limit on contributions to their campaign. The majority opinion, by Justice Samuel Alito, says that the Constitution does not permit the government to set unequal contribution limits. The opinion’s key sentence, on page 16 of the majority opinion, says, “It is a dangerous business for Congress to use the election laws to influence the voters’ choices.” Also, on page 18, “The unprecedented step of imposing different contribution and coordinated party expenditure limits on candidates vying for the same seat is antithetical to the First Amendment.”

This language should make it easier to win lawsuits against state public funding laws which set unequal rewards for some candidates, relative to other candidates. Public funding laws in Maine, Arizona, and New Mexico, treat all candidates exactly the same. The public funding that formerly existed in Massachusetts also treated all candidates equally. But public funding laws in Connecticut and New Jersey, and a pending bill in California, do not treat all candidates the same; qualifications to get public funding are easier for Republicans and Democrats than for other candidates.

Justice Stevens dissented, and said that the 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision Buckley v Valeo was mistaken when it struck down limits on campaign expenditures. He expressed the view that too much campaign advertising “obscures the issues.” He also said that “the Constitution does not require Congress to treat all declared candidates the same.” This contradicts his opinion in Cook v Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 (2001). In that opinion, he said states may not “favor or disfavor a class of candidates.” That decision struck down a Missouri state law that provided that candidates for Congress should have labels on the ballot that said what their position is, on amending the U.S. Constitution to provide for term limits for Congress.

Justices David Souter, Ruth Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer voted that the Millionaires’ Amendment is constitutional, but they didn’t join the portion of Justice Stevens’ dissent that said Buckley v Valeo should be overturned.

As I see it the entire McCain-Feingold law is antithetical to the 1st.

 


Jailed Activist Info

blog of bile