New advancements in freedom media

Posted on September 24th, 2008 by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

First:

FreeMindsTV, a libertarian cable access show in New Hampshire which recently moved to doing podcasts too, has gone terrestrial. Starting September 28, 2008 the show will air each Sunday from 3-5pm EST broadcasting through GCN. Stations currently signed up to pickup the show are:

  • WCER 900-AM Canton, Ohio
  • WBCR 1470-AM Maryville, Tennessee
  • KLID 1340-AM, Poplar Bluff, Missouri
  • KGEZ 600-AM, Great Falls, Montana

Congratulations everyone who’s part of FreeMinds{TV,Radio}. Keep up the good work. One recommendation though… redo the website. It’s a mess.

Second:

As was reported the other night Gardner Goldsmith was fired from the radio station he was at and as a result planning on accelerating Liberty Conspiracy’s online presents.

His first podcast is now available here [Monetary Manipulation by Government Part 1]and you can subscribe the the podcast through http://libertyconspiracy.podomatic.com [RSS].

One last thing, if you enjoy these programs, feel guilty for not being a big enough participant in the liberty movement or just appreciate what they are doing please consider donating a few dollars a month to the cause. How can you pass up the opportunity to become an All Seeing Eye in the liberty conspiracy? Contribute to Liberty Conspiracy here and FreeMindsTV here.

Cops taze teenager with broken back: 19 times

Posted on July 29th, 2008 by bile Tags: , , , , , 1 Comment »

Seems to me the fall caused the kid to see the future if he was talking about harming cops. That’s the first thing I’d think of after knowing they tazed someone who was in the condition he was.

SCOTUS not done yet: Part of McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance law struck down

Posted on June 26th, 2008 by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://www.ballot-access.org/…

On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled part of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law unconstitutional. Davis v Federal Election Commission, 07-320. The vote was 5-4. Here is the opinion.

This case concerned the “Millionaire’s Amendment”, which relaxes contribution limits for any congressional candidate who has a wealthy opponent. Specifically, if any congressional candidate spends at least $350,000 of his or her own funds on the campaign, then the opponents of that candidate are released from the $2,300 limit on contributions to their campaign. The majority opinion, by Justice Samuel Alito, says that the Constitution does not permit the government to set unequal contribution limits. The opinion’s key sentence, on page 16 of the majority opinion, says, “It is a dangerous business for Congress to use the election laws to influence the voters’ choices.” Also, on page 18, “The unprecedented step of imposing different contribution and coordinated party expenditure limits on candidates vying for the same seat is antithetical to the First Amendment.”

This language should make it easier to win lawsuits against state public funding laws which set unequal rewards for some candidates, relative to other candidates. Public funding laws in Maine, Arizona, and New Mexico, treat all candidates exactly the same. The public funding that formerly existed in Massachusetts also treated all candidates equally. But public funding laws in Connecticut and New Jersey, and a pending bill in California, do not treat all candidates the same; qualifications to get public funding are easier for Republicans and Democrats than for other candidates.

Justice Stevens dissented, and said that the 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision Buckley v Valeo was mistaken when it struck down limits on campaign expenditures. He expressed the view that too much campaign advertising “obscures the issues.” He also said that “the Constitution does not require Congress to treat all declared candidates the same.” This contradicts his opinion in Cook v Gralike, 531 U.S. 510 (2001). In that opinion, he said states may not “favor or disfavor a class of candidates.” That decision struck down a Missouri state law that provided that candidates for Congress should have labels on the ballot that said what their position is, on amending the U.S. Constitution to provide for term limits for Congress.

Justices David Souter, Ruth Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer voted that the Millionaires’ Amendment is constitutional, but they didn’t join the portion of Justice Stevens’ dissent that said Buckley v Valeo should be overturned.

As I see it the entire McCain-Feingold law is antithetical to the 1st.

Audio of a Missouri Ron Paul delegate being challenged for supporting Paul

Posted on May 19th, 2008 by bile Categories and Tags: Uncategorized, , , , ,

Dirty… but that’s politics.

Missouri Child Support Enforcement Division upset new computers don’t have solitaire

Posted on March 31st, 2008 by bile Categories and Tags: Uncategorized, , , , , , , , ,

http://www.missoulian.com/…

Although it’s against state policy for employees to play games like solitaire on their office computers, it’s left to each department to decide whether to keep or remove games from the computers.The issue arose recently at the Child Support Enforcement Division in the Department of Public Health and Human Services.

Division employees received new computers, but without the games like solitaire, hearts and minesweeper that come with the Microsoft Windows software package. These games had been on the division’s previous computers for years.

Some union and nonunion employees complained that the games weren’t on the new machines, said Lonnie Olson, division administrator. They said some other divisions in the same department had games on their computers.

“I said if they want them, we’ll put them on,” Olson said, adding that he wanted to make sure division employees were treated the same as others in the department.

An anonymous tipster who said he worked in the private sector criticized Olson’s decision.

“If state employees have time to play computer games, then there are too many state employees,” the tipster said in an e-mail to the Helena Independent Record. “As an employee in the private sector, I would run the risk of losing my job if my boss caught me playing games on my computer.”

Olson said he wasn’t aware of anyone abusing the privilege during work hours.

So they hang out before and/or after work to play MS Windows games? I think I agree with the private tipster. However, given the “services” the Department of Public Health and Human Services generally provides I’d rather them playing minesweeper than doing their job.

Libertarian Party primary results

Posted on February 6th, 2008 by bile Categories and Tags: Uncategorized, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 2 Comments »

California:

  1. Christine Smith : 25.1%
  2. Steve Kubby : 17.0%
  3. Wayne A. Root : 13.8%

No one else broke 10%. Phillies got 5.0%. Interestingly according to Eric Garris over at Third Party Watch Ron Paul may have actually won:

[I]t appears that Smith was beaten by “write-in votes.” The 12 ballot candidates received a total of 13,750 votes statewide, out of about 80,000 who are registered statewide.

A check of major counties shows that, in each case, the number of “write-in votes” exceeded Smith’s total. For example, in Los Angeles, the largest county in the state (making up a third of the state’s population) reported 2,157 write-in votes, compared to Smith’s total of 746. Orange County reported 1,279 write-ins compared to Smith’s total of 352. San Francisco County reported 145 write-ins, compared to Smith’s total of 86. Alameda County reported 138 write-ins, compared to Smith’s total of 133.

Unfortunately, the write-in votes will not be counted, since no one filed as an official write-in candidate, but one can make an educated guess as to what candidate LP registrants would write in.

Missouri:

  1. UNCOMMITTED : 46.8%
  2. Wanye A. Root : 18.1%
  3. Steve Kubby : 9.6%
  4. George Phillies : 8.0%

Arizona:

  1. George Phillies
  2. Wayne A. Root
  3. Barry Hess


Read the Bills Act

© 2008 blog of bile is powered by Wordpress