http://www.iht.com/…

The chief executives of the nine largest banks in the United States trooped into a gilded conference room at the Treasury Department at 3 p.m. Monday. To their astonishment, they were each handed a one-page document that said they agreed to sell shares to the government, then Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Jr. said they must sign it before they left.

The chairman of JPMorgan Chase, Jamie Dimon, was receptive, saying he thought the deal looked pretty good once he ran the numbers through his head. The chairman of Wells Fargo, Richard Kovacevich, protested strongly that, unlike his New York rivals, his bank was not in trouble because of investments in exotic mortgages, and did not need a bailout, according to people briefed on the meeting.

But by 6:30, all nine chief executives had signed — setting in motion the largest government intervention in the American banking system since the Depression and retreating from the rescue plan Paulson had fought so hard to get through Congress only two weeks earlier.

Sounds a lot like what Herbert Hoover did at the beginning of the Great Depression. We all know, or should after reading the above link, how well that went.

As Anthony Gregory posted over at LewRockwell.com/blog yesterday:

Now the pundits and historians are beginning to compare Bush to Hoover, for supposedly not doing enough and thus letting the collapse happen. LRC readers know the truth about Hoover, that it was his big-government response to the market crash that began prolonging and deepening the depression before FDR ever got to office.

If the hyper statist Bush regime is remembered for being too inactive, both in domestic and foreign policy, it portends bad things for the future of America and the way Americans perceive our nation’s history. As I mused on LRC back in 2004, “The worst likely outcome would have Bush going down in history the way Herbert Hoover has: a clueless, “laissez faire conservative” who refused to increase government activity sufficiently in the face of a national crisis.”

Also in one of my first articles, I wondered if any pro-war libertarians would have supported the New Deal. We might just find out.

The far left is truly deluded but truly believe Bush and company are capitalists and what they propose is free market capitalism. That what we have now is free market. That he wasn’t energetic enough. If that belief catches on with the general public we are in for far more hurt than this liquidation alone would inflict.

http://www.reuters.com/…

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued an emergency order on Friday temporarily halting the short selling of 799 financial stocks in an effort to protect investors and markets.

The measure underscores growing concerns that short-selling has led to sharp declines in U.S. and European financial stocks since the onset of the credit crunch.

“The emergency order temporarily banning short selling of financial stocks will restore equilibrium to markets,” SEC Chairman Christopher Cox said in a statement. “This action, which would not be necessary in a well-functioning market, is temporary in nature and part of the comprehensive set of steps being taken by the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, and the Congress.”

As Bill Anderson over at the Lew Rockwell blog has said:

The last line is a howler worthy of Paul Krugman’s twice-weekly missives in his New York Times column. The SEC is not “restoring” equilibrium; it is preventing equilibrium.

It seems that policy makers are making the same terrible errors committed by the Hoover and Roosevelt administrations during the 1930s. (The Daily Kos, a popular Democratic blog, is calling for a “New New Deal.” Frankly speaking, we are not rid of the old New Deal.) The government wants us to believe that the real problem is falling prices, so if the government can prop up prices of assets by any means, then it is doing us a favor.

Remember that Carl Menger wrote in his wonderful Grundsatze that “all things are subject to the law of cause and effect.” Indeed, Menger’s words live here; falling prices are an effect, not a cause. Short sellers and others who are helping to drive down asset prices are restoring the markets to their natural equilibrium, not preventing it. Unfortunately, the SEC is channeling Hoover and FDR, and they are preventing the economy from recovering.

The more they tinker… the more pain we will end up in.