FireStats error : FireStats is not configured

George Washington in Obama’s Inaugural Address

Posted on January 22nd, 2009 at 12:10pm by bosco Tags: , , , , ,

Propaganda

While listening to Obama’s inaugural address this section bugged me:

So let us mark this day with remembrance, of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America’s birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words be read to the people:

“Let it be told to the future world … that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive…that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet (it).”

America, in the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come.

OK, lets get some things straight about George Washington and the crossing of the Delaware.  First off, Wasington’s men weren’t doing so well on the PA side of the Delaware.  Soldiers were running away because the army couldn’t provide them with provisions.  It also doesn’t help that it was really cold.  As I type this a good portion of the Delaware is iced over.  The part that is still flowing has fast flowing chunks of ice in it.  I sure as heck wouldn’t want to try to cross it or camp out next to it without the proper equipment.

Obama states that the men were sitting around campfires before the crossing.  This isn’t true.  Washington ordered the campfires doused and then crossed the river to spend the rest of the 9 hour crossing in a tavern.  While his men froze without campfires Washington was sitting at the hearth of a bar occasionally looking out to see how things were going.  Washington also used the code phrase “Victory or Death” for the operation,  highlighting just how expendable he considered his men to be.

The enemy wasn’t advancing.  The Hessians were 9 miles away waiting in Trenton.  They had no intentions of moving.  Washington’s army was on the offensive.

The snow probably wasn’t stained with blood.  They had been camped out for a while and hadn’t done any major fighting at that spot.  Even the ensuing battle after the forced march into Trenton wasn’t that bloody.

Obama is correct that the battle was a turning point.  It was perceived as an easy win.  People got excited and joined the army.  The hardest part of the battle was the river crossing and many people who enlisted after the battle didn’t fully understand that particular hardship.  They just heard of very little bloodshed and a big win for their country.  It’s the kind of thing army recruiters pray for.

The fact that politicians lean so heavily upon this idea that our founding fathers were these great figures bugs the hell out of me.  Washington as a general was a tyrant.  He ruled the continental army with an iron fist willing to beat his men to death to get things done.  I’d be hard-pressed if someone forced me to choose between spending my time in the mountains with Che or colonial PA with Washington.  Please America, let’s stop it with the saintly Washington BS and the idea that everything from the end of the American colonial period was good.

 

Glorifying a tyrant: US penny to be redone, commemorative silver dollar to be released

Posted on September 23rd, 2008 at 8:10am by bile Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://www.washingtonpost.com/…

Starting next year, there will be four new pennies to collect, celebrating the 200th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln.

The obverse (or heads) part of the coin will stay the same, showing the 16th president facing to the right.

But the reverse (tails) part of the coin will show different times in the life of Lincoln, who is widely considered to be one of the country’s greatest leaders for freeing the slaves and saving the Union during the Civil War.

The designs for the new pennies were shown for the first time yesterday near the Lincoln Memorial.

The first new penny will be available Feb. 12, Lincoln’s 200th birthday. It will show a log cabin to honor his birth and childhood in Kentucky.

The others will show his life as a young man in Indiana, his professional life in Illinois and his presidential years in Washington (when the U.S. Capitol was being built).

The other side of the penny will continue to show the likeness of Lincoln designed by Victor David Brennan. It was introduced on the Lincoln penny 100 years ago.

A Lincoln commemorative silver dollar also will be issued next year.

Abraham Lincoln did not really free the slaves. The 13th Amendment did. The Emancipation Proclamation said “all persons held as slaves within any States, or designated part of the State, the people whereof shall be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” Only those slaves captured by the North by that point were set free. Maryland and Delaware were both slave states and not on of the supposed rebel states. While not recognized by any other government the Confederate States of America was a separate nation with it’s own government defined by their own (though heavily borrowed from the USA) constitution. Therefore from their perspective the Emancipation Proclamation meant as much as if it had come from England. Lincoln also said this of the Corwin Amendment, “[H]olding such a provision to now be implied Constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.” which read:

No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.

As for saving the Union… a highly questionable action. Even if ruled unconstitutional there is plenty of evidence that such a claim is incorrect from a legal standpoint. For example: When ratifying the new constitution, Virginia (1788), New York (1788), and Rhode Island (1790) included clauses indicating they were free to leave the new federal government confederation should it become oppressive. It seems obvious that they would not have joined if they believed it was a one way trip. From a moral standpoint its reprehensible. The Declaration of Independence clearly says:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Lincoln was in no way a great leader but a statist who put his beliefs in keeping together a union of people who did not wish to be under the same government umbrella above the lives of over 600,000 individuals.

For more information read Thomas DiLorenzo’s books Lincoln Unmasked and The Real Lincoln. Many complain his views are one sided but given the works written in excess of Lincoln’s greatness I think that’s excusable. You can also find a decent interview with DiLorenzo on CSPAN’s Q&A at Google video.

 

Democrats Sue Federal Election Commission Over McCain Spending

Posted on April 14th, 2008 at 3:25pm by bile Categories and Tags: Uncategorized, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://www.ballot-access.org/…

On April 14, the Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission, case no 1:08-cv-639, in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. The lawsuit is really directed at Senator John McCain, who has spent more than is permitted already, during the primary season, for candidates who accept primary season matching funds. McCain has said he is not bound by the limit because he never actually took primary season matching funds. But the Democratic complaint points out that he because he was eligible for them, he was able to get on the Delaware and Ohio presidential primary ballots without petitioning (the law exempts presidential primary candidates from petitioning if they are entitled to primary season matching funds).

The Democrats are suing the FEC to force the FEC to act against McCain. However, since the FEC only has two commissioners and four vacancies, it is without a quorum, so the lawsuit asks that the Democratic National Committee be given permission to sue McCain directly, since it is hopeless that the FEC can act. See their complaint here.

I hope they succeed. McCain deserves it.

 

The Des Moines Register Presidential debates

Posted on December 12th, 2007 at 8:18am by bile Categories and Tags: Uncategorized, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

http://www.iptv.org/…

Iowa Public Television will broadcast live coverage of The Des Moines Register Presidential Debates among Republican candidates for President on Wednesday, December 12, and among Democratic candidates for President on December 13. Debates will be broadcast live each day at 1 p.m., and will be re-broadcast at 7 p.m. each evening. The debates will also be available to public television stations across the country through PBS.

Confirmed candidates for the Republican debate on Wednesday, December 12 are: Ambassador Alan Keyes; former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani; former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee; Rep. Duncan Hunter; Arizona Sen. John McCain; Texas Rep. Ron Paul; former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney; Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo; and former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson.

Confirmed candidates for the Democratic debate on Thursday, December 13 are: Delaware Sen. Joe Biden; New York Sen. Hillary Clinton; Connecticut Sen. Christopher Dodd; former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards; Illinois Sen. Barack Obama; New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.

You will be able to watch the debates online live here and they are supposed to be shown on your local PBS station. I’m not seeing them listed on the PBS schedule online but it may not show because it’s a special program. In the least there will be on-demand streaming video of the full debate available the night of each event at http://www.iptv.org.

 


Read the Bills Act

blog of bile