Back in February, on the 5th, I applied for 2 hand gun purchasers permits as required by New Jersey Statute 2C:58-3(a). After 10 months, to the day, I received confirmation that the permits were ready for pickup. On my way back from a weekend in New Hampshire I stopped in to the Sbeg Yrr Cbyvpr Qrcnegzrag to pick up my permits. After waiting a few minutes the record bureau supervisor came out with my folder. I entered the small room between the main hallway and the records room where they take fingerprints among other things. After signing the two permits I was asked if there was anything else and I inquired about obtaining a complaint form. I was told they don’t have one and that I could either talk to someone specifically or the officer at the front window. I would have preferred a form so as to be specific and thorough but I decided to talk with the officer when offered the chance…

  • The officer started by saying he was “dying” to talk with me.
  • It was admitted that while NJ Statute 2C:58-3(f) says the permit is to be issued within 30 days of receiving the application the state police interpret that to mean after all the paperwork is finished and returned.
  • Some at Sbeg Yrr Cbyvpr Qrcnegzrag apparently use Google Alerts to scan for any mention of the organization online.
  • As a result they came across this blog.
  • The record bureau supervisor was not particularly thrilled with the posts which have appeared on this blog regarding my experiences with them.
  • While being “courteous” was brought up several times the record bureau supervisor said I had not been discourteous to him. Yet he implied that by blogging about my experiences I was being discourteous.
  • The application was submitted on February 5th. The Request for Criminal History Record Information was not responded to till March 13th. During the conversation the officer said it was submitted on April 5th which is approximately the time I first called to query about the status of the application since no reference letters were sent. Clearly indicating to me the application was sat on till I called.
  • My primary issue was the lack of professionalism in that when I was told I’d receive calls I did not and the obvious and unexplained delays on their end. The issue with laur’s reference form was something to note as was the misunderstanding that the second reference letter had not been received. However, they were not my primary concerns. After the conversation it raises more questions to the officer’s professionalism as he admitted reading my blog and having personal issues with it. It would seem to me by his behavior that day that it’s entirely likely a reason I didn’t receive any calls back was due to my public complaints. Don’t try to hide behind the law or the state police’s interpretation. Deception and lies are far worse then slow bureaucracy.
  • As for the law. The state police are supposed enforcers of the law. Assuming statute law is legitimate vs natural law… how convenient that when it applies to them they are able to liberally reinterpretate it to better suit themselves. I doubt very much I’d get the same leeway should I reinterperate the local ordinances against parking near the yellowed curb or purchasing a firearm without a background check.
  • If any officers of the SYCQ come across this let me suggest reading about laur’s experience with the Nutley Police Department. Part 1 and Part 2.

Read parts of our conversation on page 2.

Pages: 1 2