H.R. 3997 to be voted on by Senate tonight
Posted on October 1st, 2008 by bile Tags: bank deposits, Downsize DC, Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, FDIC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, H.R. 3997, House of Representatives, Insurance rates, Senate, Senate Finance CommitteeThe Senate agreed to vote on Wednesday night on a $700 billion financial rescue package that will include a sharp increase in the amount of bank deposits insured by the FDIC, but also includes a package of tax breaks the House of Representatives has rejected.
A Democratic aide predicted that “the Senate will pass it.”
Under the agreement to move the bill to the floor quickly, the measure will require 60 votes to pass instead of a simple majority in the 100-member chamber.
The Senate bill would increase to $250,000 from $100,000 the amount of individual deposits the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp insures, seeking to shore up consumer and business confidence in banks and win over lawmakers trying to sell their constituents on an expensive plan funded by taxpayers and seen as benefiting wealthy financiers.
The FDIC insurance money comes from the general account which is in the red already. Any payments would have to be borrowed or printed. In addition the FDIC covers all banks equally which is a distortion of the market. Insurance rates for the banks should be based on their solvency and related factors. Treating them the same incentivizes risky investments.
I’m glad it will require 60% to pass but my feeling is it’s likely to pass. Only a third of the senators are up for reelection and the FDIC and tax breaks may be enough of a carrot to push it over.
You can find the tax components at the Senate Finance Committee site but the FDIC increase is not listed.
Regardless of what we think they may do we need to keep up the pressure. Email the senators of your state and tell them in no way do you support this bill nor anything related to it. If they are up for reelection make sure you remind them this would be an absolute deal breaker for your vote (regardless of whether you would have done so anyway.)
It’s the last thing listed on the schedule so we have all day to overwhelm them with “NO”s.
You can utilize DownsizeDC or go straight to the senators site.
7 Responses to “H.R. 3997 to be voted on by Senate tonight”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.





October 1st, 2008 at 8:03 am
Via tickerguy, apparently the “troubled assets” are not required to even be originated or existing within the United States. Perhaps our government can purchase ownership of landmarks around the work and pay for it by selling naming rights. I can see it now, the Timex Big Ben Tower. Or the Clearchannel Eiffel Tower.
Senator Kerry received an angry e-mail last night after I watched him disregard taxpayer complaints on O’Reilly (albeit a little more gracefully than Rep Gary Miller. I have never donated to a political cause, but I let him know that I have Jeff Beatty’s information and checkbook at hand.
October 1st, 2008 at 9:22 am
Right. I had read that Royal Bank of Ireland or something was going to be a large seller of assets. Given that much of these were sold all over the world it’s not surprising. This bailout is for Wall St. Wall Street is international. Europe, Russia, China, Japan, etc. all have huge investments in US assets.
Lautenberg is up for reelection. According to Wikipedia he’s the least liked of those up for reelection. Dick Zimmer is an idiot and I won’t vote for him but I’ve told Lautenberg he definitely wont get my support or vote if he supports the bill.
I heard about Kerry’s bitching and O’Reilly’s scolding. Representative democracy, right.
October 1st, 2008 at 10:40 am
Hot and up coming property east of Shanghai. The Treasury could get in on the ground floor of this opportunity, bile. Um, assuming there is a floor in the building that is.
October 1st, 2008 at 2:15 pm
[...] I reported earlier on the some of the changes made to the House amendments by the Senate. Unfortunately the only way to find out is through piecing together random news articles as at last I checked the actual bill to be voted on was not publicly available. So… I hadn’t seen that the AMT was part of this supposed tax reduction. We’ve all have heard the horrors of the AMT and yet Congress has been unable to do anything about it until now? It’s not even a carrot for passage, as a real tax reduction would be, but the promise not to use the stick… as hard. Another example where government regulation has lead to an unforeseen problem that would simply not have existed in any sort of resemblance of a free market. Now they are trying to sweeten this poison bill with it. Getting rid of the AMT is a great idea… but not on the back of one of the most egregious corporatist bills to come our way in a generation. [...]
October 1st, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Nothing like a little economic strife to highlight the constant class war.
October 1st, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Class war huh? Indeed.
October 1st, 2008 at 7:02 pm
Quite…