<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NationalServiceAct.org changes FAQ in response to increased coverage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogofbile.com/2008/08/04/nationalserviceactorg-changes-faq-in-response-to-increased-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/08/04/nationalserviceactorg-changes-faq-in-response-to-increased-coverage/</link>
	<description>from the bowels of the mind</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bosco</title>
		<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/08/04/nationalserviceactorg-changes-faq-in-response-to-increased-coverage/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>bosco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogofbile.com/?p=1436#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>Chucky, thanks for you post.

&lt;blockquote&gt;If all interaction between people is voluntary
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Are you going to "voluntarily" give up your money when somebody's starving kid is holding a knife to your throat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chucky, thanks for you post.</p>
<blockquote><p>If all interaction between people is voluntary
</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you going to &#8220;voluntarily&#8221; give up your money when somebody&#8217;s starving kid is holding a knife to your throat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laur</title>
		<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/08/04/nationalserviceactorg-changes-faq-in-response-to-increased-coverage/#comment-2308</link>
		<dc:creator>laur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogofbile.com/?p=1436#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>thanks for the post, bile.

I'm in the middle of writing another email (that will hopefully not go unanswered) to the ANSA outlining the following:

1. acknowledgement of their recent change to the website
2. asking them to be more specific about non-participation in their mandatoy programs
3. explaining the 13th Amendment
4. illustrating the inconsistencies of the US Supreme Court

ill post my letter here and will include any replies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the post, bile.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the middle of writing another email (that will hopefully not go unanswered) to the ANSA outlining the following:</p>
<p>1. acknowledgement of their recent change to the website<br />
2. asking them to be more specific about non-participation in their mandatoy programs<br />
3. explaining the 13th Amendment<br />
4. illustrating the inconsistencies of the US Supreme Court</p>
<p>ill post my letter here and will include any replies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuckv</title>
		<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/08/04/nationalserviceactorg-changes-faq-in-response-to-increased-coverage/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>chuckv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogofbile.com/?p=1436#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>NOTE: the following comment assumes a market economy
Regarding overpopulation, the people responsible to deciding whether or not to have a child incur most, if not all of the costs.  If all interaction between people is voluntary, then other parties will only benefit from the existence of and interaction with the child.  Therefore, because one party (the parents) incurs all the costs while many of the benefits are diffused throughout society, we have far fewer than the efficient number of children being brought into the world.  Therefore, the world is not overpopulated, it is underpopulated.
Economics 1
Statists 0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTE: the following comment assumes a market economy<br />
Regarding overpopulation, the people responsible to deciding whether or not to have a child incur most, if not all of the costs.  If all interaction between people is voluntary, then other parties will only benefit from the existence of and interaction with the child.  Therefore, because one party (the parents) incurs all the costs while many of the benefits are diffused throughout society, we have far fewer than the efficient number of children being brought into the world.  Therefore, the world is not overpopulated, it is underpopulated.<br />
Economics 1<br />
Statists 0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
