<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Gravel joins Libertarian Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogofbile.com/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/</link>
	<description>from the bowels of the mind</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bile</title>
		<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/comment-page-1/#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>bile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landofbile.com/blog/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>Radical as in an anarchist. The libertarian wing of the LP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical as in an anarchist. The libertarian wing of the LP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bosco</title>
		<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/comment-page-1/#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>bosco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landofbile.com/blog/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>She's apparently pretty radical.  People are wondering if she'll get more of the &#34;non-voting&#34; vote, which I find to be hilarious.

 There is a lot of dispute between left libertarians.  For the most part I've seen Proudhon's possession vs ownership argument at the crux of most left libertarian's ideas about property.  If you read &#34;What is Property?&#34; you can see that property is the cause for most of the debate on the left side of libertarianism or anarchism.  Unfortunately Proudhon has a style of writing that really buns me the wrong way, sort of like Mill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s apparently pretty radical.  People are wondering if she&#8217;ll get more of the &quot;non-voting&quot; vote, which I find to be hilarious.</p>
<p> There is a lot of dispute between left libertarians.  For the most part I&#8217;ve seen Proudhon&#8217;s possession vs ownership argument at the crux of most left libertarian&#8217;s ideas about property.  If you read &quot;What is Property?&quot; you can see that property is the cause for most of the debate on the left side of libertarianism or anarchism.  Unfortunately Proudhon has a style of writing that really buns me the wrong way, sort of like Mill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bile</title>
		<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/comment-page-1/#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>bile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landofbile.com/blog/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>She seems to be an anarcho-capitalist of sorts but I've not read her major works so I may be off.

 I should note that there are &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_libertarian" rel="nofollow"&gt;left libertarians&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://libertarianwiki.org/Left_libertarian" rel="nofollow"&gt;left libertarians.&lt;/a&gt; I'm not sure why the two don't have different terms. The former really doesn't sound like libertarianism to me at all... perhaps it's the article or I'm just misunderstanding something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She seems to be an anarcho-capitalist of sorts but I&#8217;ve not read her major works so I may be off.</p>
<p> I should note that there are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_libertarian" rel="nofollow">left libertarians</a> and <a href="http://libertarianwiki.org/Left_libertarian" rel="nofollow">left libertarians.</a> I&#8217;m not sure why the two don&#8217;t have different terms. The former really doesn&#8217;t sound like libertarianism to me at all&#8230; perhaps it&#8217;s the article or I&#8217;m just misunderstanding something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bosco</title>
		<link>http://blogofbile.com/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/comment-page-1/#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>bosco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landofbile.com/blog/2008/03/25/mike-gravel-joins-libertarian-party/#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  The left-libertarians (at least &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roderick_T._Long" rel="nofollow"&gt;Roderick Long&lt;/a&gt;) seem pretty psyched about &lt;a href="http://www.votemary2008.com/node/7" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mary Ruwart&lt;/a&gt; trying to get a libertarian nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  The left-libertarians (at least <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roderick_T._Long" rel="nofollow">Roderick Long</a>) seem pretty psyched about <a href="http://www.votemary2008.com/node/7" rel="nofollow">Mary Ruwart</a> trying to get a libertarian nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
