http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/…

 The following principles explain the club’s opposition to “universal coverage”:

  1. Health policy should focus on making health care of ever-increasing quality available to an ever-increasing number of people.
  2. “Universal coverage” could be achieved only by forcing everyone to buy health insurance or by having government provide health insurance to all, neither of which is desirable.
  3. In a free society, people should have the right to refuse health insurance.
  4. If governments must subsidize those who cannot afford medical care, they should be free to experiment with different types of subsidies (cash, vouchers, insurance, public clinics & hospitals, uncompensated care payments, etc.) and tax exemptions, rather than be forced by a policy of “universal coverage” to subsidize people via “insurance.”

More can be found here and here.

Related posts:

  1. Anti-Universal Coverage Club
  2. CATO@Liberty blog links to Blog of Bile
  3. Looking forward to universal healthcare?
  4. Welcome the Church of Universal Coverage
  5. Depends on what your definition of “is” is