http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/…

Here are the guiding principles of the Anti-Universal Coverage Club:

  1. Health policy should focus on making health care of ever-increasing quality available to an ever-increasing number of people.
  2. To achieve “universal coverage” would require either having the government provide health insurance to everyone or forcing everyone to buy it.  Government provision is undesirable, because government does a poor job of improving quality or efficiency.  Forcing people to get insurance would lead to a worse health-care system for everyone, because it would necessitate so much more government intervention.
  3. In a free country, people should have the right to refuse health insurance.
  4. If governments must subsidize those who cannot afford medical care, they should be free to experiment with different types of subsidies (cash, vouchers, insurance, public clinics & hospitals, uncompensated care payments, etc.) and tax exemptions, rather than be forced by a policy of “universal coverage” to subsidize people via “insurance.”

[Post to Twitter] 

Related posts:

  1. Michael Cannon talks about the Anti-Universal Coverage Club on Cato Daily Podcast
  2. CATO@Liberty blog links to Blog of Bile
  3. Welcome the Church of Universal Coverage
  4. Looking forward to universal healthcare?
  5. NJ considers forcing residents to have health coverage

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 27th, 2007 at 10:01 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.